EPA throws out science in favor of anti-regulatory ideology

Share
EPA throws out science in favor of anti-regulatory ideology
Photo by Jabastin Jayaraj / Unsplash

In her latest opinion piece for The BMJ (British Medical Journal), Naomi Oreskes examines the US Environmental Protection Agency's recent actions on climate science and glyphosate. These moves, she argues, are not really about science — they are about dismantling the regulatory state. The administration repealed the greenhouse gas endangerment finding. It invoked the Defense Production Act to shield glyphosate manufacturers. Corporate profits, not public health, are driving the agenda. Oreskes connects these actions to a longer history of industry obstruction, from tobacco to fossil fuels, and asks what scientists and medical professionals should do when even "pure" science inevitably illuminates political problems.

The full piece is freely available at The BMJ: https://www.bmj.com/content/392/bmj.s465

Read more

The Editorial that Defends a Ghostwritten Paper by Citing Additional Ghostwritten Papers

The Editorial that Defends a Ghostwritten Paper by Citing Additional Ghostwritten Papers

A few days ago, sixty-four individuals co-signed an editorial in Archives of Toxicology calling for the reversal of the November 2025 retraction of Williams, Kroes & Munro 2000 (hereafter WKM2000), published in the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. The editorial, authored by Christopher Borgert and 63 others, appeared on the

By Alexander "Sasha" Kaurov, Jason MacLean, Naomi Oreskes