AI’s x-ray vision into Texas’ air limits

Texas sets its own limits for hundreds of industrial chemicals. Where they can be compared with EPA's and ATSDR's, 36 of 41 come out the same or weaker. The reasoning is buried in thousands of pages of assessment.

When starving birds started eating plastic

Seabirds picked up off Wellington beaches between 1958 and 1977 turned out to hold a record of the decade plastic arrived in the ocean.

How Australia and NZ weighed the paraquat and Parkinson's evidence

On 24 July 2026, Syngenta announced it was withdrawing every paraquat product it sells in Australia and New Zealand. The reason given by the company's managing director for the region was not safety: “Regulatory constraints, combined with a highly complex and increasingly expensive supply chain, have made the

Hallucination and Scientific Integrity at Both Ends of the Ocular

The word “hallucination” has gotten a lot of mixed rep in science. “Hallucinated” references are a tell of lousy research, and vibe-written papers flooding the journals. At the same time, the word was used in the 2024 Nobel-winning method for deep-network “hallucinating” of proteins (Anishchenko et al.

One in a Million: How we choose what risk is acceptable

What is an acceptable risk? We, as individuals, can adopt different operational heuristics for handling risk in our daily lives, when it comes to personal, financial or health choices. But environmental and pollution issues affect whole communities, or even the whole planet, so we have to arrive at some common

Imported Science: How Compromised American Science Underwrites New Zealand's Regulation

In this piece for The Conversation NZ, I show how bad science (manufactured mostly in the US) penetrates regulation worldwide, and how small countries without their own research capacity become dependent on it. New Zealand's approval of Roundup rests on three Monsanto-shaped reviews we've written

Managing the pitfalls of private money

In a new piece in Science, Naomi Oreskes argues that the postwar bargain between American science and the federal government can no longer be taken for granted. As public funding falters, private money is moving to fill the gap. That brings a familiar risk: funders quietly reshaping the research agenda.

Of Mice and Men and Round Numbers

What does it mean for a chemical to be safe? The chemical industry as we know it is largely a child of the Second World War. The capacities built for the war effort — synthetic organic chemistry at industrial scale, nerve-agent research having common origin with pesticide research, polymer and

What Grokipedia Says About Science

Wikipedia's value is in its shared, if imperfect, factual reality, with edits tracked in public and editors who are, for all their biases, still human.

Accidental climate science

Records kept for harvests, gods, festivals, and trade now tell us about the changing climate.

The Editorial that Defends a Ghostwritten Paper by Citing Additional Ghostwritten Papers

A few days ago, sixty-four individuals co-signed an editorial in Archives of Toxicology calling for the reversal of the November 2025 retraction of Williams, Kroes & Munro 2000 (hereafter WKM2000), published in the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. The editorial, authored by Christopher Borgert and 63 others, appeared

When a Chatbot Says Water Is More Dangerous Than Glyphosate

Half the world now uses generative AI assistants (Stanford HAI, 2026). Many of the queries ordinary people ask land on questions about science, including the contested-science topics this newsletter covers. So we decided to check something simple: how do these everyday AI assistants answer? Do they give consistent answers?