Latest

The Editorial that Defends a Ghostwritten Paper by Citing Additional Ghostwritten Papers

The Editorial that Defends a Ghostwritten Paper by Citing Additional Ghostwritten Papers

A few days ago, sixty-four individuals co-signed an editorial in Archives of Toxicology calling for the reversal of the November 2025 retraction of Williams, Kroes & Munro 2000 (hereafter WKM2000), published in the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. The editorial, authored by Christopher Borgert and 63 others, appeared on the

By Alexander "Sasha" Kaurov, Jason MacLean, Naomi Oreskes
AI will soon be able to audit all published research – what will that mean for public trust in science?

AI

AI will soon be able to audit all published research – what will that mean for public trust in science?

Self-correction is fundamental to science. One of its most important forms is peer review, when anonymous experts scrutinise research before it is published. This helps safeguard the accuracy of the written record. Yet problems slip through. A range of grassroots and institutional initiatives work to identify problematic papers, strengthen the

By Alexander "Sasha" Kaurov, Naomi Oreskes
Scientists’ political donations reflect polarization in academia – with implications for the public’s trust in science

Archive

Scientists’ political donations reflect polarization in academia – with implications for the public’s trust in science

People who lean left politically reported an increase in trust in scientists during the COVID-19 pandemic, while those who lean right politically reported much lower levels of trust in scientists. This polarization around scientific issues – from COVID-19 to climate change to evolution – is at its peak since surveys started tracking

By Alexander "Sasha" Kaurov